+124.1%
RPRX vs NIO
-62.3%
+186.4%
-20.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.3% | -0.3% | -5.0% | -5.3% |
| 7D | -2.8% | -6.7% | +3.9% | -2.4% |
| 30D | +7.2% | -20.0% | +27.2% | +8.4% |
| 3M | +10.9% | -30.5% | +41.3% | +12.9% |
| 6M | +34.6% | -20.7% | +55.3% | +35.6% |
| YTD | +59.0% | -25.7% | +84.6% | +60.6% |
| 1Y | +72.5% | -38.6% | +111.1% | +75.6% |
| 3Y | +124.1% | -62.3% | +186.3% | +134.3% |
| All | +124.1% | -62.3% | +186.4% | +134.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling