-100.0%
RPGL vs VT
+13.1%
-113.1%
-100.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | VT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.1% | -4.1% | +6.2% | +10.0% |
| 7D | +55.9% | -4.2% | +60.0% | +67.7% |
| 30D | -62.1% | -5.8% | -56.3% | -55.1% |
| 3M | -55.5% | -5.2% | -50.3% | -47.3% |
| 6M | -98.8% | +0.1% | -98.9% | -98.7% |
| YTD | -99.8% | +8.2% | -108.1% | -99.8% |
| 1Y | -99.9% | +10.1% | -110.1% | -99.9% |
| All | -100.0% | +13.1% | -113.1% | -100.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling