+60.3%
ROST vs UMAC
+488.3%
-427.9%
-21.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -3.2% | +3.3% | +0.2% |
| 7D | -2.5% | -4.0% | +1.5% | -2.4% |
| 30D | -10.3% | -9.4% | -0.9% | -10.2% |
| 3M | -2.6% | +3.0% | -5.6% | -3.0% |
| 6M | +6.5% | +27.2% | -20.7% | +4.8% |
| YTD | +25.9% | +84.7% | -58.8% | +22.3% |
| 1Y | +52.3% | +136.5% | -84.1% | +46.3% |
| All | +60.3% | +488.3% | -427.9% | +36.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling