-15.9%
ROL vs UMAC
+494.0%
-509.9%
-44.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.4% | -3.1% | +3.5% | +0.4% |
| 7D | -1.4% | -0.9% | -0.5% | -1.4% |
| 30D | -4.1% | -7.7% | +3.6% | -4.1% |
| 3M | -22.5% | -26.4% | +3.9% | -22.5% |
| 6M | -37.7% | +61.9% | -99.5% | -37.3% |
| YTD | -39.6% | +86.5% | -126.1% | -39.2% |
| 1Y | -36.0% | +156.3% | -192.3% | -35.7% |
| All | -15.9% | +494.0% | -509.9% | -16.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling