+56.3%
RMD vs ONTO
+104.0%
-47.8%
-37.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ONTO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.4% | +6.2% | -6.5% | -0.7% |
| 7D | -5.0% | -1.0% | -4.0% | -4.9% |
| 30D | +2.2% | -2.9% | +5.1% | +2.1% |
| 3M | +17.8% | -2.5% | +20.3% | +16.2% |
| 6M | -11.3% | +28.2% | -39.5% | -15.5% |
| YTD | -4.4% | +69.8% | -74.2% | -11.9% |
| 1Y | -15.7% | +162.9% | -178.6% | -26.6% |
| All | +56.3% | +104.0% | -47.8% | +32.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ONTO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ONTO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ONTO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ONTO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling