+60.2%
RMD vs LDOS
+35.4%
+24.8%
-37.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | +0.1% | -0.6% | -0.5% |
| 7D | -5.3% | -3.7% | -1.7% | -4.5% |
| 30D | +8.4% | +16.4% | -7.9% | +4.5% |
| 3M | +7.1% | +7.4% | -0.3% | +5.1% |
| 6M | +15.8% | -0.3% | +16.1% | +14.9% |
| YTD | +0.2% | -24.0% | +24.2% | +4.6% |
| 1Y | -1.4% | -29.6% | +28.2% | +4.8% |
| All | +60.2% | +35.4% | +24.8% | +37.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling