+42.1%
RKT vs ZETA
+281.1%
-239.0%
-50.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | -1.8% | 0.0% | -1.4% |
| 7D | +6.0% | -2.4% | +8.4% | +6.5% |
| 30D | +0.7% | +15.6% | -14.9% | -2.6% |
| 3M | +11.8% | +41.5% | -29.7% | +3.0% |
| 6M | -7.6% | +63.4% | -71.1% | -18.3% |
| YTD | -28.7% | +51.3% | -80.0% | -36.3% |
| 1Y | -32.6% | +65.8% | -98.4% | -41.5% |
| 3Y | +42.1% | +279.2% | -237.1% | -31.5% |
| All | +42.1% | +281.1% | -239.0% | -31.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling