+81.3%
RKT vs PCG
-21.0%
+102.3%
-55.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PCG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.1% | -1.0% | -4.1% | -4.7% |
| 7D | -7.5% | -2.0% | -5.5% | -6.9% |
| 30D | +26.6% | -2.7% | +29.3% | +27.7% |
| 3M | -2.4% | -25.1% | +22.6% | +7.2% |
| 6M | -7.4% | -22.3% | +14.9% | -0.1% |
| YTD | -29.2% | -18.5% | -10.7% | -25.3% |
| 1Y | -23.5% | -21.8% | -1.7% | -17.7% |
| All | +81.3% | -21.0% | +102.3% | +65.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PCG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PCG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PCG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PCG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling