+39.4%
RKT vs BIIB
-19.0%
+58.4%
-50.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BIIB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.8% | -0.8% | -1.9% | -2.5% |
| 7D | -1.0% | -5.4% | +4.4% | +0.9% |
| 30D | -2.4% | +1.7% | -4.1% | -2.8% |
| 3M | +1.9% | +5.8% | -3.9% | -0.5% |
| 6M | -13.9% | +11.9% | -25.8% | -18.4% |
| YTD | -30.6% | +19.7% | -50.4% | -37.0% |
| 1Y | -34.4% | +46.7% | -81.1% | -46.7% |
| All | +39.4% | -19.0% | +58.4% | +59.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BIIB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BIIB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BIIB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BIIB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling