+1,211.5%
RKLB vs UMAC
+473.8%
+737.7%
-61.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 10y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | -2.5% | +4.1% | +2.0% |
| 7D | -2.0% | -3.4% | +1.4% | -1.5% |
| 30D | -22.4% | -15.1% | -7.4% | -21.0% |
| 3M | -45.2% | -10.8% | -34.4% | -44.8% |
| 6M | -12.5% | +15.7% | -28.2% | -18.6% |
| YTD | -9.8% | +80.1% | -89.9% | -21.5% |
| 1Y | +30.0% | +116.7% | -86.7% | +9.9% |
| All | +1,211.5% | +473.8% | +737.7% | +848.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 10y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
10y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling