+944.2%
RKLB vs TRGP
+261.7%
+682.5%
-61.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TRGP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.3% | -1.0% | -3.3% | -3.9% |
| 7D | 0.0% | -0.7% | +0.7% | +0.2% |
| 30D | -21.2% | +9.5% | -30.7% | -24.2% |
| 3M | -41.7% | +10.8% | -52.5% | -45.2% |
| 6M | -11.8% | +25.3% | -37.1% | -23.3% |
| YTD | -9.6% | +60.3% | -69.9% | -32.2% |
| 1Y | +34.1% | +84.6% | -50.4% | -9.0% |
| All | +944.2% | +261.7% | +682.5% | +520.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TRGP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TRGP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TRGP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TRGP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling