+944.2%
RKLB vs ENTG
+48.2%
+896.0%
-61.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENTG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.3% | +1.4% | -5.6% | -5.0% |
| 7D | 0.0% | +8.9% | -9.0% | -4.6% |
| 30D | -21.2% | -0.8% | -20.4% | -21.3% |
| 3M | -41.7% | +6.6% | -48.3% | -45.6% |
| 6M | -11.8% | +22.1% | -33.8% | -24.1% |
| YTD | -9.6% | +70.2% | -79.8% | -36.5% |
| 1Y | +34.1% | +76.7% | -42.6% | -7.7% |
| All | +944.2% | +48.2% | +896.0% | +649.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENTG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENTG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENTG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENTG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling