-48.3%
RGTI vs LSCC
-12.7%
-35.6%
-48.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3mo.
| Period | Portfolio | LSCC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -6.9% | -5.5% | -1.4% | -3.7% |
| 7D | -18.1% | +7.0% | -25.1% | -21.9% |
| 30D | -17.6% | -2.3% | -15.3% | -19.1% |
| 3M | -48.3% | -12.5% | -35.8% | -46.1% |
| All | -48.3% | -12.7% | -35.6% | -46.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LSCC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LSCC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LSCC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LSCC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling