+1,046.2%
RGTI vs LDOS
+37.2%
+1,009.1%
-82.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -6.4% | +1.1% | -7.5% | -6.9% |
| 7D | +9.6% | +1.9% | +7.7% | +8.4% |
| 30D | -13.4% | +12.8% | -26.2% | -19.5% |
| 3M | -31.2% | -1.0% | -30.1% | -31.5% |
| 6M | -35.9% | +6.2% | -42.0% | -38.7% |
| YTD | -45.1% | -23.2% | -21.9% | -36.1% |
| 1Y | -63.3% | -29.5% | -33.8% | -54.8% |
| All | +1,046.2% | +37.2% | +1,009.1% | +876.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling