+650.7%
RGTI vs LDOS
+38.7%
+612.0%
-77.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.6% | -0.9% | -2.8% | -3.2% |
| 7D | +2.5% | -4.2% | +6.7% | +4.8% |
| 30D | -13.7% | -7.9% | -5.8% | -9.9% |
| 3M | -22.6% | +4.1% | -26.7% | -24.8% |
| 6M | -13.4% | -28.2% | +14.8% | +5.2% |
| YTD | -31.2% | -28.5% | -2.7% | -16.5% |
| 1Y | -7.6% | -27.7% | +20.0% | +12.0% |
| All | +650.7% | +38.7% | +612.0% | +640.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling