+652.2%
RGTI vs BLDR
-57.1%
+709.3%
-77.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BLDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.7% | +2.4% | -1.6% | -0.5% |
| 7D | +0.5% | -8.2% | +8.7% | +4.6% |
| 30D | -17.1% | -16.6% | -0.5% | -9.7% |
| 3M | -26.0% | -23.2% | -2.8% | -17.6% |
| 6M | -9.9% | -33.7% | +23.9% | +7.9% |
| YTD | -31.1% | -41.3% | +10.3% | -13.5% |
| 1Y | -8.5% | -58.8% | +50.3% | +39.2% |
| 3Y | +652.2% | -57.5% | +709.7% | +956.3% |
| All | +652.2% | -57.1% | +709.3% | +956.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling