-48.3%
RGTI vs ABCL
+11.3%
-59.7%
-48.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -6.9% | -1.1% | -5.8% | -6.2% |
| 7D | -18.1% | -3.3% | -14.8% | -16.1% |
| 30D | -17.6% | -7.1% | -10.5% | -14.0% |
| 3M | -48.3% | +4.7% | -53.1% | -49.0% |
| All | -48.3% | +11.3% | -59.7% | -49.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling