-1.1%
RGEN vs EPAM
-54.6%
+53.5%
-50.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | -2.4% | +1.2% | -0.4% |
| 7D | -4.9% | +2.0% | -6.9% | -5.5% |
| 30D | +5.7% | +6.5% | -0.8% | +2.9% |
| 3M | +32.4% | +19.9% | +12.5% | +23.0% |
| 6M | +33.2% | -16.9% | +50.1% | +39.8% |
| YTD | +2.3% | -42.9% | +45.2% | +20.4% |
| 1Y | +39.0% | -30.4% | +69.4% | +51.1% |
| All | -1.1% | -54.6% | +53.5% | +7.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling