+89.7%
RF vs AZO
+11.4%
+78.3%
-31.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AZO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | -1.4% | +0.8% | -0.4% |
| 7D | -0.1% | -0.8% | +0.7% | 0.0% |
| 30D | -4.0% | -5.1% | +1.1% | -3.2% |
| 3M | +5.6% | -7.2% | +12.8% | +6.7% |
| 6M | +13.1% | -20.7% | +33.8% | +17.1% |
| YTD | +13.6% | -14.2% | +27.7% | +15.8% |
| 1Y | +16.0% | -32.2% | +48.1% | +24.0% |
| All | +89.7% | +11.4% | +78.3% | +76.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AZO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AZO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AZO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AZO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling