+190.3%
RDDT vs ZTS
-56.0%
+246.3%
-61.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.0% | -0.3% | -1.6% | -1.9% |
| 7D | -7.4% | -3.8% | -3.6% | -6.4% |
| 30D | -7.7% | -2.0% | -5.7% | -7.4% |
| 3M | -17.8% | -10.2% | -7.6% | -15.4% |
| 6M | +5.5% | -39.4% | +44.9% | +24.8% |
| YTD | -36.3% | -40.8% | +4.5% | -24.0% |
| 1Y | -39.0% | -50.1% | +11.1% | -22.0% |
| All | +190.3% | -56.0% | +246.3% | +262.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling