+212.8%
RDDT vs ZETA
+165.9%
+46.9%
-61.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | -1.2% | +2.8% | +1.9% |
| 7D | +2.1% | -3.7% | +5.9% | +3.3% |
| 30D | +2.8% | +5.7% | -2.9% | +0.5% |
| 3M | -8.9% | +50.4% | -59.4% | -20.6% |
| 6M | +15.1% | +65.5% | -50.4% | -3.4% |
| YTD | -31.4% | +48.3% | -79.7% | -41.0% |
| 1Y | -39.4% | +45.4% | -84.8% | -48.1% |
| All | +212.8% | +165.9% | +46.9% | +126.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling