+212.8%
RDDT vs TTWO
+43.7%
+169.1%
-61.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | TTWO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | -0.7% | +2.3% | +2.1% |
| 7D | +2.1% | +0.4% | +1.8% | +1.9% |
| 30D | +2.8% | -11.3% | +14.1% | +12.6% |
| 3M | -8.9% | +1.6% | -10.5% | -9.6% |
| 6M | +15.1% | +2.1% | +13.0% | +13.8% |
| YTD | -31.4% | -15.8% | -15.5% | -22.9% |
| 1Y | -39.4% | -12.6% | -26.8% | -33.8% |
| All | +212.8% | +43.7% | +169.1% | +166.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TTWO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TTWO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TTWO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TTWO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling