+196.2%
RDDT vs TMUS
+17.2%
+178.9%
-61.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | TMUS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.3% | +0.1% | -3.4% | -3.3% |
| 7D | +3.3% | -0.3% | +3.5% | +3.2% |
| 30D | -7.6% | +3.1% | -10.8% | -6.9% |
| 3M | -12.7% | +2.4% | -15.1% | -12.0% |
| 6M | +7.2% | -17.1% | +24.2% | +2.1% |
| YTD | -35.0% | -9.1% | -25.9% | -36.2% |
| 1Y | -35.0% | -23.6% | -11.4% | -38.6% |
| All | +196.2% | +17.2% | +178.9% | +293.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TMUS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TMUS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TMUS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TMUS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling