+196.2%
RDDT vs RCL
+98.8%
+97.3%
-61.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | RCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.3% | -0.3% | -3.0% | -3.2% |
| 7D | +3.3% | -0.5% | +3.7% | +3.5% |
| 30D | -7.6% | -17.3% | +9.7% | +1.8% |
| 3M | -12.7% | -2.8% | -10.0% | -11.9% |
| 6M | +7.2% | -4.4% | +11.6% | +8.2% |
| YTD | -35.0% | -4.2% | -30.8% | -36.9% |
| 1Y | -35.0% | -23.4% | -11.7% | -27.5% |
| All | +196.2% | +98.8% | +97.3% | +88.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling