+196.2%
RDDT vs ONTO
+52.2%
+143.9%
-61.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ONTO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.3% | +4.9% | -8.2% | -4.7% |
| 7D | +3.3% | +9.7% | -6.4% | +0.3% |
| 30D | -7.6% | -8.8% | +1.2% | -6.0% |
| 3M | -12.7% | +4.5% | -17.2% | -18.3% |
| 6M | +7.2% | +56.4% | -49.2% | -16.0% |
| YTD | -35.0% | +78.1% | -113.1% | -52.7% |
| 1Y | -35.0% | +171.3% | -206.3% | -61.4% |
| All | +196.2% | +52.2% | +143.9% | +92.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ONTO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ONTO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ONTO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ONTO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling