+147.8%
RDDT vs MSTZ
-99.1%
+247.0%
-61.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MSTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | -3.8% | +5.3% | +1.1% |
| 7D | +2.1% | +17.0% | -14.9% | +4.3% |
| 30D | +2.8% | -61.8% | +64.6% | -7.2% |
| 3M | -8.9% | -54.6% | +45.6% | -12.8% |
| 6M | +15.1% | -59.3% | +74.3% | +13.4% |
| YTD | -31.4% | -74.6% | +43.2% | -31.8% |
| 1Y | -39.4% | -18.8% | -20.6% | -27.2% |
| All | +147.8% | -99.1% | +247.0% | +160.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MSTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MSTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MSTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MSTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling