+212.8%
RDDT vs LULU
-79.0%
+291.8%
-61.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | LULU | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | +2.2% | -0.6% | +0.9% |
| 7D | +2.1% | -1.6% | +3.8% | +2.6% |
| 30D | +2.8% | -18.1% | +20.9% | +8.8% |
| 3M | -8.9% | -18.8% | +9.8% | -3.4% |
| 6M | +15.1% | -39.2% | +54.3% | +33.7% |
| YTD | -31.4% | -52.4% | +21.0% | -14.1% |
| 1Y | -39.4% | -40.3% | +0.9% | -29.1% |
| All | +212.8% | -79.0% | +291.8% | +345.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LULU.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LULU return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LULU return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LULU wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling