+196.2%
RDDT vs LDOS
+3.3%
+192.8%
-61.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.3% | -2.9% | -0.4% | -2.9% |
| 7D | +3.3% | -7.1% | +10.4% | +4.4% |
| 30D | -7.6% | -6.1% | -1.6% | -6.9% |
| 3M | -12.7% | +5.6% | -18.3% | -13.8% |
| 6M | +7.2% | -26.9% | +34.1% | +15.2% |
| YTD | -35.0% | -27.9% | -7.1% | -30.0% |
| 1Y | -35.0% | -26.8% | -8.2% | -30.5% |
| All | +196.2% | +3.3% | +192.8% | +223.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling