+196.2%
RDDT vs GLDM
+97.5%
+98.7%
-61.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.3% | -1.7% | -1.6% | -2.6% |
| 7D | +3.3% | +0.7% | +2.5% | +3.0% |
| 30D | -7.6% | +0.3% | -7.9% | -7.7% |
| 3M | -12.7% | +0.7% | -13.4% | -13.0% |
| 6M | +7.2% | -15.4% | +22.6% | +11.6% |
| YTD | -35.0% | +1.0% | -36.0% | -35.7% |
| 1Y | -35.0% | +19.7% | -54.8% | -41.0% |
| All | +196.2% | +97.5% | +98.7% | +60.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling