+212.8%
RDDT vs FLNC
-34.1%
+246.9%
-61.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | +2.5% | -0.9% | +1.3% |
| 7D | +2.1% | -4.1% | +6.2% | +2.5% |
| 30D | +2.8% | -24.8% | +27.6% | +6.0% |
| 3M | -8.9% | -59.1% | +50.2% | -0.2% |
| 6M | +15.1% | -42.0% | +57.0% | +17.7% |
| YTD | -31.4% | -49.8% | +18.4% | -30.2% |
| 1Y | -39.4% | +43.1% | -82.5% | -49.6% |
| All | +212.8% | -34.1% | +246.9% | +198.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling