+212.8%
RDDT vs FCUV
-97.4%
+310.2%
-61.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FCUV | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | +3.3% | -1.7% | +1.6% |
| 7D | +2.1% | -66.5% | +68.6% | +0.5% |
| 30D | +2.8% | +5.0% | -2.2% | +4.3% |
| 3M | -8.9% | +63.8% | -72.7% | +6.0% |
| 6M | +15.1% | -67.8% | +82.9% | +39.3% |
| YTD | -31.4% | -82.4% | +51.0% | -15.5% |
| 1Y | -39.4% | -94.7% | +55.3% | -22.5% |
| All | +212.8% | -97.4% | +310.2% | +175.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FCUV.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FCUV return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FCUV return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FCUV wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling