+212.8%
RDDT vs EOSE
+295.0%
-82.2%
-61.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | EOSE | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | -1.0% | +2.6% | +1.7% |
| 7D | +2.1% | +1.8% | +0.3% | +1.7% |
| 30D | +2.8% | -6.8% | +9.7% | +3.2% |
| 3M | -8.9% | -36.3% | +27.4% | -4.7% |
| 6M | +15.1% | -38.8% | +53.8% | +18.2% |
| YTD | -31.4% | -65.5% | +34.2% | -25.3% |
| 1Y | -39.4% | -45.3% | +5.8% | -40.2% |
| All | +212.8% | +295.0% | -82.2% | +98.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EOSE.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EOSE return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EOSE return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EOSE wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling