+206.2%
RDDT vs DOCN
+181.2%
+25.1%
-61.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | DOCN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | +2.8% | -3.8% | -1.8% |
| 7D | +1.0% | +1.1% | -0.2% | +0.5% |
| 30D | -0.5% | -9.6% | +9.1% | +1.4% |
| 3M | -16.0% | -37.7% | +21.7% | -5.9% |
| 6M | +4.9% | +115.2% | -110.3% | -28.5% |
| YTD | -32.8% | +133.7% | -166.5% | -57.2% |
| 1Y | -33.5% | +250.2% | -283.6% | -65.2% |
| All | +206.2% | +181.2% | +25.1% | +83.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DOCN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DOCN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DOCN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DOCN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling