+212.8%
RDDT vs CLSK
-30.4%
+243.2%
-61.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | CLSK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | +6.8% | -5.2% | +0.1% |
| 7D | +2.1% | +7.7% | -5.6% | +0.3% |
| 30D | +2.8% | +12.2% | -9.4% | -0.4% |
| 3M | -8.9% | -15.5% | +6.5% | -7.3% |
| 6M | +15.1% | +39.3% | -24.3% | +3.6% |
| YTD | -31.4% | +35.1% | -66.4% | -39.0% |
| 1Y | -39.4% | +34.0% | -73.5% | -48.0% |
| All | +212.8% | -30.4% | +243.2% | +202.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CLSK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CLSK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CLSK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CLSK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling