-52.2%
RDDT vs CLSK
-65.2%
+13.0%
-64.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | CLSK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -7.9% | -16.5% | +8.5% | -5.1% |
| 7D | -27.6% | -30.7% | +3.1% | -23.2% |
| 30D | -37.0% | -53.8% | +16.8% | -29.2% |
| 3M | -39.6% | -57.9% | +18.3% | -31.6% |
| 6M | -45.3% | -57.6% | +12.3% | -38.6% |
| YTD | -59.2% | -43.9% | -15.3% | -56.3% |
| 1Y | -52.2% | -65.7% | +13.5% | -45.3% |
| All | -52.2% | -65.2% | +13.0% | -45.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CLSK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CLSK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CLSK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CLSK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling