+212.8%
RDDT vs BTDR
+50.6%
+162.2%
-61.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | BTDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | +3.7% | -2.2% | +0.9% |
| 7D | +2.1% | -3.4% | +5.5% | +2.7% |
| 30D | +2.8% | +32.6% | -29.8% | -3.3% |
| 3M | -8.9% | -32.2% | +23.3% | -4.3% |
| 6M | +15.1% | +52.4% | -37.3% | +2.0% |
| YTD | -31.4% | +6.7% | -38.1% | -36.3% |
| 1Y | -39.4% | -15.2% | -24.2% | -43.5% |
| All | +212.8% | +50.6% | +162.2% | +185.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BTDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BTDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BTDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BTDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling