+212.8%
RDDT vs BRKR
-42.4%
+255.1%
-61.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BRKR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | -0.2% | +1.8% | +1.6% |
| 7D | +2.1% | -8.7% | +10.8% | +4.4% |
| 30D | +2.8% | -9.9% | +12.7% | +5.3% |
| 3M | -8.9% | -3.1% | -5.9% | -9.8% |
| 6M | +15.1% | +45.5% | -30.4% | +1.7% |
| YTD | -31.4% | +13.7% | -45.1% | -35.9% |
| 1Y | -39.4% | +67.4% | -106.9% | -49.3% |
| All | +212.8% | -42.4% | +255.1% | +149.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BRKR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BRKR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BRKR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BRKR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling