+212.8%
RDDT vs BLDR
-71.1%
+283.9%
-61.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BLDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | +2.4% | -0.8% | +1.1% |
| 7D | +2.1% | -8.2% | +10.4% | +4.0% |
| 30D | +2.8% | -16.6% | +19.4% | +6.7% |
| 3M | -8.9% | -23.2% | +14.2% | -4.8% |
| 6M | +15.1% | -33.7% | +48.8% | +24.2% |
| YTD | -31.4% | -41.3% | +10.0% | -25.2% |
| 1Y | -39.4% | -58.8% | +19.4% | -27.6% |
| All | +212.8% | -71.1% | +283.9% | +273.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling