+212.8%
RDDT vs BIIB
-1.0%
+213.8%
-61.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | BIIB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | +0.8% | +0.8% | +1.6% |
| 7D | +2.1% | -1.7% | +3.8% | +2.1% |
| 30D | +2.8% | +4.0% | -1.1% | +3.0% |
| 3M | -8.9% | +8.6% | -17.5% | -8.6% |
| 6M | +15.1% | +14.0% | +1.1% | +15.8% |
| YTD | -31.4% | +23.4% | -54.8% | -30.7% |
| 1Y | -39.4% | +45.9% | -85.3% | -38.7% |
| All | +212.8% | -1.0% | +213.8% | +161.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BIIB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BIIB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BIIB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BIIB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling