+212.8%
RDDT vs BBIO
+145.2%
+67.6%
-61.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | BBIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | -0.1% | +1.6% | +1.6% |
| 7D | +2.1% | -3.2% | +5.3% | +2.7% |
| 30D | +2.8% | -13.6% | +16.4% | +5.7% |
| 3M | -8.9% | +7.2% | -16.2% | -10.5% |
| 6M | +15.1% | +1.5% | +13.6% | +14.3% |
| YTD | -31.4% | -5.3% | -26.1% | -31.3% |
| 1Y | -39.4% | +37.7% | -77.2% | -44.6% |
| All | +212.8% | +145.2% | +67.6% | +138.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BBIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BBIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BBIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BBIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling