+217.0%
RCL vs FLNC
-69.8%
+286.8%
-67.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | -8.3% | +6.5% | -0.7% |
| 7D | -2.2% | -4.2% | +2.0% | -1.7% |
| 30D | -15.7% | -20.0% | +4.3% | -13.3% |
| 3M | -8.0% | -56.9% | +48.9% | +1.5% |
| 6M | -10.1% | -35.5% | +25.4% | -9.7% |
| YTD | -5.9% | -48.8% | +42.9% | -4.2% |
| 1Y | -23.5% | +49.3% | -72.8% | -37.9% |
| 3Y | +174.4% | -61.8% | +236.2% | +146.5% |
| All | +217.0% | -69.8% | +286.8% | +143.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling