+241.9%
RCL vs ECHO
+900.0%
-658.1%
-35.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ECHO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.4% | +1.9% | -1.5% | +0.2% |
| 7D | -1.2% | +5.7% | -6.9% | -1.7% |
| 30D | +17.8% | +13.8% | +4.0% | +16.2% |
| 3M | +4.9% | +9.1% | -4.1% | +3.8% |
| 6M | +23.7% | -24.9% | +48.7% | +26.6% |
| YTD | +17.8% | -8.0% | +25.8% | +17.3% |
| 1Y | +28.9% | +42.9% | -14.0% | +22.5% |
| 3Y | +241.9% | +926.7% | -684.8% | +146.7% |
| All | +241.9% | +900.0% | -658.1% | +146.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ECHO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ECHO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ECHO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ECHO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling