+241.9%
RCL vs ARMK
+96.6%
+145.2%
-35.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.4% | +0.1% | +0.3% | +0.3% |
| 7D | -1.2% | +2.7% | -3.9% | -2.5% |
| 30D | +17.8% | -1.5% | +19.3% | +18.3% |
| 3M | +4.9% | -11.6% | +16.5% | +11.5% |
| 6M | +23.7% | +6.7% | +17.0% | +18.3% |
| YTD | +17.8% | +47.4% | -29.6% | -7.0% |
| 1Y | +28.9% | +41.5% | -12.6% | +4.3% |
| 3Y | +241.9% | +95.5% | +146.3% | +152.9% |
| All | +241.9% | +96.6% | +145.2% | +152.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling