+269.1%
RCL vs AMC
-72.0%
+341.1%
-35.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.1% | -12.5% | +9.4% | -2.1% |
| 7D | +3.9% | 0.0% | +3.9% | +3.9% |
| 30D | +11.8% | +4.4% | +7.3% | +11.4% |
| 3M | -0.8% | +15.4% | -16.2% | -2.2% |
| 6M | +23.6% | +93.7% | -70.1% | +15.7% |
| YTD | +17.6% | +97.4% | -79.8% | +9.4% |
| 1Y | +28.3% | +23.2% | +5.1% | +22.6% |
| All | +269.1% | -72.0% | +341.1% | +304.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling