+274.2%
RCL vs ALHC
+21.9%
+252.3%
-35.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.4% | -2.9% | +4.3% | +1.5% |
| 7D | +6.5% | +1.0% | +5.5% | +6.5% |
| 30D | +15.9% | -14.2% | +30.0% | +16.4% |
| 3M | +2.7% | -45.1% | +47.8% | +4.6% |
| 6M | +15.2% | -59.5% | +74.8% | +17.9% |
| YTD | +19.2% | -62.8% | +82.1% | +22.2% |
| 1Y | +31.6% | -55.5% | +87.1% | +34.3% |
| 3Y | +274.2% | +25.7% | +248.5% | +237.4% |
| All | +274.2% | +21.9% | +252.3% | +237.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling