+153.2%
RBRK vs HTZ
-55.5%
+208.7%
-56.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.7% | +1.3% | +0.3% | +1.6% |
| 7D | +0.7% | +7.5% | -6.8% | +0.4% |
| 30D | +10.4% | +47.4% | -37.0% | +7.5% |
| 3M | +21.6% | -54.9% | +76.6% | +25.0% |
| 6M | +70.7% | -47.0% | +117.7% | +72.2% |
| YTD | +22.5% | -55.3% | +77.7% | +24.8% |
| 1Y | +8.2% | -57.6% | +65.9% | +10.2% |
| All | +153.2% | -55.5% | +208.7% | +142.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling