+57.2%
RBLX vs ZTS
-59.2%
+116.4%
-74.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | -0.6% | +1.4% | +0.9% |
| 7D | +8.1% | -4.5% | +12.6% | +8.8% |
| 30D | +23.9% | -3.3% | +27.2% | +24.4% |
| 3M | +8.1% | -9.7% | +17.9% | +9.8% |
| 6M | -23.7% | -38.8% | +15.1% | -17.8% |
| YTD | -44.6% | -41.2% | -3.4% | -39.9% |
| 1Y | -66.2% | -50.3% | -15.9% | -61.9% |
| All | +57.2% | -59.2% | +116.4% | +94.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling