+59.4%
RBLX vs TNA
+101.9%
-42.5%
-74.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TNA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.4% | +1.1% | +0.3% | +1.1% |
| 7D | +5.1% | -7.3% | +12.3% | +7.1% |
| 30D | +28.0% | -14.2% | +42.2% | +33.1% |
| 3M | +4.6% | -4.6% | +9.2% | +5.6% |
| 6M | -24.7% | +36.9% | -61.6% | -32.0% |
| YTD | -43.8% | +42.5% | -86.4% | -49.7% |
| 1Y | -65.8% | +45.8% | -111.5% | -69.8% |
| 3Y | +59.4% | +104.7% | -45.3% | +18.1% |
| All | +59.4% | +101.9% | -42.5% | +18.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TNA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TNA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TNA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TNA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling