+57.2%
RBLX vs NTAP
+144.6%
-87.4%
-74.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NTAP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | -0.6% | +1.4% | +1.0% |
| 7D | +8.1% | -1.0% | +9.1% | +8.4% |
| 30D | +23.9% | -7.5% | +31.4% | +26.4% |
| 3M | +8.1% | +14.6% | -6.5% | +2.6% |
| 6M | -23.7% | +91.0% | -114.7% | -40.5% |
| YTD | -44.6% | +73.7% | -118.3% | -55.3% |
| 1Y | -66.2% | +51.2% | -117.4% | -71.4% |
| All | +57.2% | +144.6% | -87.4% | +6.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTAP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTAP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTAP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTAP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling