-23.7%
RBLX vs NCLH
-28.2%
+4.4%
-42.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | NCLH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | -1.9% | +2.7% | +1.3% |
| 7D | +8.1% | -6.5% | +14.7% | +10.0% |
| 30D | +23.9% | -22.1% | +46.0% | +32.3% |
| 3M | +8.1% | -18.7% | +26.8% | +16.2% |
| 6M | -23.7% | -28.4% | +4.7% | -16.8% |
| All | -23.7% | -28.2% | +4.4% | -16.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NCLH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NCLH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NCLH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NCLH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling