+55.9%
RBLX vs HTZ
-87.2%
+143.1%
-74.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.7% | -5.3% | +4.6% | -0.5% |
| 7D | +8.0% | -10.4% | +18.4% | +8.4% |
| 30D | +20.2% | -2.4% | +22.5% | +19.8% |
| 3M | +3.5% | -60.9% | +64.4% | +6.0% |
| 6M | -28.9% | -50.2% | +21.3% | -28.1% |
| YTD | -45.1% | -59.7% | +14.7% | -44.0% |
| 1Y | -66.2% | -66.0% | -0.2% | -65.4% |
| All | +55.9% | -87.2% | +143.1% | +78.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling